In August 2015 I blogged
about the best and worst books on my shelves. Not in terms of content.
Best-preserved. Worst-preserved. There are hundreds of books that I’d
categorise as well-preserved. And hardly any books that are truly falling
apart.
At the time, I lamented the disintegration
of a movie guide compiled by Leonard Maltin. If you are the sort of movie snob
who sneers at Leonard Maltin and his cinematic output, preferring Leslie
Halliwell’s dissection of cinema greats, note that even permanent grumpy
bastard Halliwell acknowledged Maltin as someone who paved the way for so many
writers in that field. Including the many writers who contributed to Maltin’s
guide…
Maltin comes across as a bright and breezy
team-player. Halliwell was more of a lone gunman at a funeral, looking to
settle non-existent grudges with the friends of deceased movie directors.
The chief criticism of Halliwell? Still
doing the rounds on the internet. In the case of Maltin and his crew, at least
Maltin and his crew watched the movies they wrote about, whereas Halliwell, er,
didn’t always see the stuff he panned.
We can say that about him. He’s dead, and
unlikely to sue.
After that, the other criticism of Halliwell
is that his view of cinema had a severe before
and after phase. He liked the stuff he watched while growing up, and came
to detest the stuff he saw floating past him as he grew old.
What a grumpy bastard.
I view Halliwell’s legacy as more about bringing
old movies to television. That was his job. If you watched a black and white film
on Channel 4 on a rainy day, chances are Halliwell was the guy who brokered the
deal.
No, I don’t have Halliwell’s guide on my
shelves. Reasons. I saw his books on the shelves of movie snobs whose taste in
films had clearly disappeared up someone else’s arsehole, never mind their own
arseholes. And so, my perception is a little tainted.
So. I have these Maltin guides. They are
slave to fate, chance, kings, and desperate interpretations of the source
material. (John Donne, reviewing Hamlet
for Leonard Maltin’s guide. The Zeffirelli version of the play. Three stars,
with slightly catty comments in iambic pentameter.)
Why do I use Maltin’s books? They list the
movie running time very clearly, unlike many a Blu-ray cover. I see, glancing
at the reference shelf, that I inherited an encyclopaedia on film personnel by
Ephraim Katz. Had to move some dust out of the way to access that one.
What don’t I use? Clearly, dustily, the Katz
volume. I don’t put faith in star-rated movie review systems. Neither, it
seems, did Halliwell. For roughly the last twenty years of his life, he stopped
handing out four star awards to movies.
Tell me the year of release and how long the
picture runs. Note if it is in black and white. Don’t put spoilers if you can
avoid them. By all means, give me your view of the film. Don’t tell me my view
of the film, though. I’ll provide my own appreciation of the movie, thanks all
the same.
Without
spoilers.
Halliwell in particular had a reputation for
spoiling movies. He gave zero stars to Titanic,
and noted that this sort of Hollywood
depiction of a real-life boat crash in 1912 was constructed squarely with one
eye on a sequel.
I made some of that up. He died in 1989. His
books survive on reference shelves to this day. Turning to another work on my
reference shelf – the Biographical
Dictionary edited by Magnus Magnusson – I see there is no entry on
Halliwell.
Magnusson himself was such a figure of note,
translating breezy Icelandic sagas to English, that he could have included
himself in that dictionary, but, presumably, was too modest to say anything.
Maltin’s crew served up enough atmosphere in
short entries on cinema to satisfy the grumpiest tastes. If anything, Halliwell
reminds me of Thayer David in Save the
Tiger, meeting in a dive of a cinema to arrange a plot-based activity that
I will not spoil for you here. Jack Lemmon wants him to (REDACTED), as that
would save a lot of bother.
I don’t know why Thayer David reminds me of Leslie
Halliwell. Add glasses and a beard and you are nearly there. You could say that
of Leonard Maltin, too, I guess.
Don’t
look at me. Watch the screen.
Wonderful advice from Thayer David, for all professional
movie writers. It’s not about you, but about the movie you watched. Or think
you saw…
I’ve sat through movie reviews in newspapers
that dropped American political assassinations into the wrong year, put the
wrong Bruce on the battlefield at Bannockburn, set forth a view on a movie
based on the music that didn’t actually surface in that film – invalidating the
point, and, most tellingly, threw a spoiler into American Beauty – Annette Bening’s character kills him.
More
accurate spoiler: she doesn’t kill him at all. What fucking film were you watching? Spoiler for the spoiler: Kevin
Spacey’s character tells you, in his introduction near the start of the film,
that he has less than a year left on the planet.
Newspaper and magazine reviews of films.
Yes, I guess they were a thing, once. Back in 2015, Leonard Maltin’s movie
reference work lay just behind me, on the floor, in three chunks. I am about to
remember the office layout. Just behind me is the wall. And I mean right behind
me, right now.
There was a time, in this book-festooned
alcove, when the desk was turned to the left and I had space on the floor
behind me. Space enough to leave the room, for that is where the door lives.
The reference book was in three chunks. Now
I write of the tome again, and it sits above me on a shelf, ahead, slightly to
the right of this keyboard. Still in three chunks. Why mention it? I’ve only just
replaced the book.
But the new version isn’t a new version. It’s
split in two chunks. I should say…in two volumes.
Eventually, when Maltin stopped doing those annual paperback guides, the body
of work was split into two pieces. The classic movie book takes us through
silent movies up until the talkies in 1965. And the later, slightly thicker,
volume goes up to the end of civilisation as we once knew it: revised, 2017.
That was in the Before Times, when you could
go to the cinema without catching the plague. For movie information, I head to
the internet. This will always cover the latest releases, as if by technology.
(Possibly, as if by magic.) If I want the Maltin-flavoured cinema observations
of yesteryear, I now have those two books on my shelves.
They are chunky paperbacks, and will not stand the test of time. Perhaps both volumes will split into three slices, as
the earlier guide did. These replacement apples didn’t fall far from the tree.
I described the broken volume as being a thick
paperback made of thin paper with no more durable a spine than that of a
liquidiser-fresh jellyfish.
And I commented that the internet is the
place I head off to for movie information. Maltin’s illness and the rise of the
internet combined to bring his era to an end. It was a good run. He had decades
out of publishing the guide, which went annual in the mid-1980s.
But
how to make money off that, in the digital world? Could it be done? Maltin and
his team had a stab at it. But the book is the book. Creating an annual guide
doesn’t translate into a minute by minute guide, online. The atmosphere is wildly
different.
Books like that, reference works, provide an
alternative to just using the Wikipedia.
(Shout out to Jennifer’s Body. Two
stars from Leonard Maltin. Ah, taste is taste, opinion is opinion, and rarely
the twain shall meet.)
Reference works should be dead. I have a
full shelf of them above me, with other reference books bleeding onto many a
bookcase elsewhere. But they aren’t dead. I don’t want every snippet of
information to come from the Wikipedia.
Seek multiple sources. Granted, Wikipedia
will provide you with multiple sources – nearer the site of the initial
explosion of knowledge. If you are to read the Wikipedia at all, pay attention
to the TALK pages. You’ll learn a
little more.
For example, if you accidentally stumble on
a Korean pop-singer’s Wikipedia entry, you’ll note the invisible collision
between Wikipedia’s standards and the standards of the average pop fandom.
All
those entries demanding the height of a poodle be returned to the main page as
socially relevant…are cruelly crushed by soulless editors who simply state NOT DONE. The heartless fiends go on to
complicatedly state, acidly, why Wikipedia is not a fan magazine.
As for internet movie sites…
No, I never go near Rotten Tomatoes. I only use the Internet
Movie Database to check the extensive cast listings. Siskel and Ebert?
Weren’t they on The Muppet Show…
Metacritic?
I don’t believe I have, though everyone’s a critic online. Including Halliwell,
who is resurrected there. And who remains grumpy there, even when handing one
of his cherished films four stars. Yes, I’ve read Halliwell’s line in movie
chat…
Offline? Halliwell? No thanks. Not on my
shelves. Grumpy and Deaded. Deaded being one of the forgotten characters in
that Snow White cartoon. (Four stars
from Maltin. And from Halliwell. You can all stop arguing about this. Disney’s
first gay character was the Wicked Queen from that cartoon. The end.)
Movie guides provide opinions by teams of
critics, reviewers, and space cadets wired to the back end of the moon. There
are capsule overviews and space capsule overviews. You sometimes wonder which
planet these opinions were formed on.
But there are facts. Production details.
Snippets. Trivial items. The overall writing style of Maltin and his crew
appealed to me. And the book, falling apart on my shelves, bugged me. So I
replaced that with two books that I reached for while researching films
mentioned in this blog post. There. I’ve had my use out of them already.
RLLauthor@outlook.com and @RLL_author GO TO AMAZON KINDLE STORE AND TYPE RLL. YOU WILL FIND MY BOOKS.
Sunday, 7 May 2023
THE CASE OF THE SPLIT BOOK: A REPORT FROM A FUGITIVE.
Wednesday, 2 December 2020
A YEAR IN THE BLINK OF A TWELVE-DAY WEEK.
Not to go all Solomon Grundy on you, but time flies
when you’re having a Pandemic Attack.
For the convenience of rhyme, Solomon Grundy
was born on a Monday. He didn’t last long. And 2020 didn’t last long, either.
It’s been a twelve-day week instead of a twelve-month year. And what a week
it’s not been.
Festina
Lente isn’t Elon Musk’s babysitter or his new electrical perambulator.
Latin is a universal language in the sense that every single phrase in Latin
offers up the same universal truth: Latin is dead. You are not. Remember this.
Make
haste slowly. If there’s one thing to make a speeded-up year of not doing awfully much zoom in like a
Zoom meeting on LSD, why, it’s not one thing but many things. The Pandemic was (and
remains) many things.
When
sorrows come, they come not single spies, but in raging flaming clouds of
fleets of swarms of zillions of fucking battalions.
I quote loosely from the general text. Hamlet is the go-to manual for studying
the effects of Covid-19 on just about everything. To be. We would have a proper year. Alas, turns out it was more in
the line of…
Not to
be.
Much happened on a personal level that I
will not relate here. So what else is there to talk about? Plans that slid
sideways from under me, making way for new plans, seem as though from another
world.
On the reading front, I no longer know and
no longer care how many books I’ve read this year. It was a short reading year,
and felt like twelve days. The last time I read a book, I read it in a sitting.
But it’s all a blur, at this end of the short year.
Everything dragged, and suddenly it was
Christmas.
Books came into the house. A few books were
read by someone who may have been me. My plan to keep score of the overall gain
or loss on the bookshelf front…that went utterly nowhere. Did I buy in nineteen
books and read twenty? Well, I’m ahead of the game by one book, right?
No clue. Kept score. Lost score. I could
sift through electronic receipts, but what’s the point? Does reading an old
book again count for anything? For the experience I gained in revisiting a
story, yes. But I gave up the arithmetical quirks of what to add to and what to
leave out of the mystical calculations.
I ran my YouTube channel for two years and
managed an average of a little over one video per week. Life under the pandemic
got to me, and I took a fucking break. Had to. Other priorities. But I will
return to video production.
Life is what happened to Allen Saunders
while he was making other plans.
The reading of books was a thing in 2020. My
solid stainless steel plan to note how I was doing on that front? That plan
stood out in the rain, softened, split, and then…only half of it sagged into
the leaf-strewn street. Even fragmenting plans, it seems, cannot fall apart in
a regular way.
If I misremember rightly, I read three short
books in one day. They didn’t count, being really short. But they were books. I
have them on my shelves. Somewhere. So maybe they did count. We all did stuff
in 2020. But finding those handy bookmarks in the compressed diary of a
twelve-day week, telling me what I did, is proving difficult.
The bookshelves themselves came into play
once more. I had a crushing need for space downstairs. This led to the return
of furniture to this floor. The office floor. And that forced me to hack a farm-fresh
clearing from the jungle of bookcases.
This was a mighty feat. I accomplished the
task by wriggling bookshelves across the floor, in a dance that wouldn’t have
looked out of place in a barn. Generally, my bookshelves line the walls and
also project deep into the room. In this latest bookcase case, I found a way to
rearrange the puzzle pieces. At one end of one room I’ve created an area in
which the bookcases line the walls.
Mostly.
It’s been a year of hurry up and wait. What
a fast week it has been. The year is a has-been of a year, all right. Delivery
drivers played chap-door-run-away with parcels the size of televisions.
Out shopping, those who didn’t queue in
masks queued in scarves. With gloves. Autumn-wear came early. We were counted
into supermarkets as we shuffled through the airlocks, and we were counted back
out as we fled with prized loot.
Toilet
roll.
No one
can explain the scarcity of toilet roll to me. Covid-19 is a shitty disease,
not the shitting disease. I left a supermarket with a pack of 24 paper nuggets,
each more precious than gold. You could wipe your arse with gold toilet paper,
but then you’d be King Midas. Sitting on a golden throne.
There will be signs of the coming
Apocalypse. A well-worn idea. In our case, the signs asked us to wear a face-covering and to wash our hands. Please don’t touch your face. Or anyone
else’s face. We should add more signs.
Change your underwear frequently.
Rattling pots and pans at night in support
of people isn’t in support of those people if they are trying to sleep come
mid-evening.
Being in government and sticking to rules is
a thing people in government should stick to. This last item simply exposes
people in government as never sticking to any rules during the working day.
Covid-19 merely unveiled an entire approach to living. It’s not as though the
official in charge of that thing decided, spontaneously, that it would be okay
to break the new rule for reasons of no reason at all. No. That fucker was
clearly breaking all the rules every live-fucking-long day.
I feel as though it were only yesterday, a
million years ago, when young idiotic Americans (with names reminiscent of
models of electrically-driven cars) were determined to have their spring break
and damn the fatal consequences.
It has taken me this long on my wayward
journey to realise that spring break means the Easter fucking Holidays. But
that is a mere aside. It is of little or no consequence. An electron microscope
could provide a sturdy result on a scientific point, but…
This is December and there are no flying
fucks left to give. Those vanished in the first wave of toilet roll hoarding.
Flying fucks were rationed at the rate of two per customer, and soon ran out.
That was late in March.
The march of the mood of the year was a slow
one, to the tune of a popular little ditty by Chopin. Covid-19 turned the speed
up to 11. Even Chopin’s Funeral March
gets the squeaky squirrel treatment, played fast during a Pandemic Attack.
When I watch videos on YouTube, I almost
always hit double speed. With rare exceptions, everyone’s a squeaky squirrel.
Unless I watch a video featuring a voice that starts out squeaky or fast-paced.
Increase the speed in those cases, and only bats hear the results.
I am a very patient person, I am here to
tell you. Yet I find myself listening to videos that are 40-minute rambles to
start with. At double the speed, a rambling video leaves me twenty minutes to
go and stare out at the empty streets during a Pandemic. Priorities, right.
Last blog post of the year. School’s out for
Christmas. I’ve resisted the Covid-19 waffle that the world’s been indulging in
all year/twelve-day week. So I know I am not adding anything to the talk.
Except talk of vaccine today.
Jam tomorrow, then.
And what of tomorrow? New plans? Old plans,
dusted down. I scrapped my notions of keeping score. How many books will I read
next year? And how many will I buy? (I am awaiting a parcel of many books as I
type.)
The real question is how many books will I
enjoy? How many are going to be useful? The tally, the score, is not important.
It never was. And that’s no secret. You’d think I’d have spent the year
hunkered in the bunker, all Covid-proofed and high on coffee, rattling through
a book a day.
And each day, a book on a wildly different
topic at that.
Fuck. I’ve just remembered there’s a pizza
in the oven. I’m five minutes away from that meeting. Prompt. I will remain
prompt as long as I can. In anticipation of sleeping in, I set the alarm and I
climbed out of bed just as the alarm decided to warn me of its existence.
Prompt today. For once, no hurrying.
And only a wait of a few minutes for food.
Not exactly waiting. Hurry up and wait. It is still a thing. Just as the virus
is still a thing. And it will remain a thing, even as the first waves of
vaccines hit the veins.
This is not the fucking time to go fucking
daft. Unless it is time to go daft…for pizza. It is socially distanced, being
on a separate floor. I will mask the flavour of the pizza with sauce. That’s
the only mask I can use, when devouring food.
Wednesday, 1 January 2020
EIGHT FOLDERS: A REPORT FROM A FUGITIVE.
Tuesday, 22 March 2016
MORE INJURY FOR WRITERS: A REPORT FROM A FUGITIVE.
I suspect I'm on a quest to damage a finger or thumb each dawn. Some of those digits are definitely going to be mine.
Despite the latest trauma, I republished seven times today. My recent formatting war with the back catalogue of prehistoric files forced something from the mirk.
When that something surfaced from the depths, I went tsk. In the sense that I said fuck.
The project irresponsible is slim thriller. I've split the book into four chunks. Not hard to do - I wrote the book in four chunks.
Sometimes, bringing old stories into line with e-book conventions is easy. That's not the case with this fossil.
However, I spotted something awkward - meaning it wasn't wrong.
It was, infuriatingly, right. I speak of the gargoyle. There's a gargoyle in the book. And I researched the word gargoyle before I wrote the gargoyle into my tale.
A gargoyle gurgles.
If a gargoyle doesn't divert water away from a building, it isn't a gargoyle.
Remembering this bit of research from the hinterland of yesteryear, over the hills and very far away, I did the obvious thing.
I ran a search for the word in my published works.
And I saw that, in at least three cases, I'd gone on to use the term incorrectly much later.
This brings up an important point. If you must correct something in an e-book, run a check on all of your books. When factual errors creep in, as they must, they come not single spies, but in battalions.
If you research gargoyles, and write properly about them, hell, that doesn't stop you from writing improperly about them later.
Gargoyles crawled over my work like, er, gargoyles on a cathedral. And I'd let the definition drift. That loose masonry needed fixing.
I fixed.
On top of that, I'm from the last generation to be taught the use of whom. If you find yourself using the word in your writing, here's some handy advice.
Kill it - kill it with fire.
I went through my published work and checked for usage. The word has the odour of bottled creatures to it.
Though I didn't use the word much, I had the advantage of knowing how to use it. I'd say that's the same as not using a scythe much, but professing great skill just the same.
Raymond Chandler defended the word, but I am not here to defend Raymond Chandler.
And so...
Welcome, anatomically accurate gargoyles. Farewell, whom. It lingers in my blog posts, but no more in my fiction. Gargoyles and whom forced me to republish seven books today. Our world survived the tumult.
Sunday, 26 January 2014
HAMLET OR NOT HAMLET. THAT IS THE QUESTION: A REPORT FROM A FUGITIVE.
Bleeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeerrrrrrrrrrrrrrrgh wasn't one of those words.
I sailed into the night, back and forth, between two computers. One machine, at least, had the internet. So I whiled away some of the time in random searching.
The name of an actress came up.
I thought I'd check out the internet's opinion of this actress. She gave excellent performances in a few movies I'd seen. I'd long-ago decided she'd serve as the model for a character in one of my books.
Which one? That character is in my Hamlet adaptation. To avoid confusion, the story's called not hamlet. And that's perfectly true...
Better to say that it's not just Hamlet. Another story intrudes. One of the features of Hamlet that always interested me was the notion of a play within the play.
Strolling players visit the castle. Hamlet manipulates them into putting on a particular play. He does this to drop heavy hints about his father's murder.
Hamlet has no concrete proof - he's playing a hunch based on a chat with a ghost...
But the play's the thing. Hamlet wants to see the murderer's reaction to the play.
I thought, suppose the strolling players have their own plot going on. A tale following the murderous trail of the clown, Pagliaccio. Anyway, in my mash-up, Pagliacci works with Hamlet.
Deep into the night, my archive takes an age to sort out, and, internetting, I stumble on this actress. She's the one I think of when I imagine the character Columbina.
I fix files. And I copy files. I use the Twitter to reveal the slowness of file-movery. At some point, it's 2.00 in the morning and I'm reading the blog of an actress.
She has a blog? Worth checking out?
As events showed, yes. There were insightful gems on that blog.
The night before, I was writing until 1.00 in the morning. Odd hours? I don't think so. Normally I wouldn't go far beyond 1.00 if writing.
Background archiving was looking after itself, but I had to look after that too. I owned that paranoid feeling. Must do this now. If I switch the computer off and wait until morning, the whole system might fritz.
Of course, that paranoia stems from an actual event. HERE'S A BLOG POST ABOUT THAT.
This is why I stayed up until 2.00. Archiving wasn't allowed to stop for mere sleep.
My Hamlet adaptation stalled after six chapters when no one wanted to publish it. After writing just six chapters, I decided I'd shop a story around unfinished.
Confidence in the finished article, nestled in some futuristic world we'd reach one day.
The future, though, was floating on the mighty Amazon. I published the first chapter of not hamlet in my INCOMPLETE UNCOLLECTED SHORT WORKS.
Kindle's there to be used.
I've been looking at that excerpt. And I'll let it stand as it is, in the collection. But for release into the wild as a full novel, I think my early attempt at Kindle formatting must go.
Hamlet's adventures deserve shorter paragraphs. They'll be the same paragraphs - just chopped in half for ease of digital reading.
Midnight descends. I'll finish this post another time. Sleep is considered essential by some. But only if you wish to function. No staying awake until 2.00 this time around.
Where were we? This is not a tale of evil kidney transplantation. (With regard to a non-functioning external hard drive, we're in the realms of dodgy transfusion.)
Hamlet. I stayed up late, fixing the archive. And I read a blog. That actress was on my mind. Obviously, I thought of Columbina. In my tale, she's Pagliacci's second wife. She serves as inspiration for Pagliacci's move into Hamlet's world...
But this blog post isn't about any of that stuff. At 2.00 in the morning I'd read the woman's blog, archived my fiction, and had enough.
Come morning, even though I was thinking of Shakespeare and Leoncavallo, my main thought was of the archive. I bring things forward each year, so my freshest vault contains the latest copies and updates of Kindle PRC files.
That's in case I iron out a glitch or alter some blurb.
Projects in progress as one year ends are archived within that year. Then they are copied to a new year for further work. The old archive is then left lying around on the off-chance that something catastrophic happens.
Though for something catastrophic to happen to fresher chunks of files and NOT to me too, I'd have to be out of the building when that plane hits.
My thoughts went to Neon Gods Brought Down by Swords and all its sequels and offshoots. I knew I had to weed out that sub-archive. So that's what I've been doing. Weeding.
The books that follow the first volume don't exactly follow the first volume. They exist at the same time. Same setting. A few scenes overlap.
Old ground. Different viewpoints.
It's a nightmare, juggling those characters. She's here, and hears that news. So she can't be there when that event happens, as she's come from yonder to be here.
Like that. Multiplied.
I can't let things fester beyond all rational and irrational control. With this in mind, I started destroying duplicate files. Devious ones.
Files with different names containing duplicated text. I had to cap a lid on that bullshit.
And I created a massive table, showing the first book's timeline, with the out-of-sequence flashbacks set down in chronological order.
Yes. The fun part of writing. Continuity is important to some people. Maybe it's a phase readers are going through.
So far, only part of the plot of book four felt the strain. Sorting out the action in books two and three should smooth the running for books four and five.
Especially as she's here when she hears that news.
Lots of ideas. Plenty of books on the unwritten pile, waiting to go. Where does that leave Shakespeare, if I turn my attention to a sprawling series instead?
I'll get to those assorted tales. Without rushing. Every year, my ambition is to write a whole bunch of books. And this year is no different.
Every year I take interesting detours into reading, or experiencing stuff, or damn-well thinking through ideas that are no good and must be worked on. Sometimes, worked over. As in...
Tied to a chair. Blowtorches are waved.
Anyway. I published. And I'll go on publishing. Every detour into another project creates another project.
I must away, to see to more archiving. There's a file (with chapter titles in it) that flies in the face of the plot of at least two books...